Wednesday July 30, 2014




Rail woes multi-faceted problem

License Comments

If there is one issue weighing heavily on Prairie farmers this winter, even more than the unseasonably cold weather, it is the inability of the rail system to deal with a record harvest of grain to port for export.

The situation is one where most farmers, and even governments are pointing fingers at the rail companies.

But as is the case in most things, that is an over simplification in terms of assigning blame.

The federal government should stand up and take its share.

There are supposed to be rules set into the regulatory system surrounding rail service which should be sufficient to have the rail companies doing a better job of things.

But federal regulation over the years have been largely lip service to farmers, with the government having little appetite to reprimand the big two rail lines. The result is the government has become basically a toothless watchdog.

But I am not sure any amount of government influence might have imparted on the situation, farmers have to recognize the system is under what has to be thought of as extraordinary pressures.

While recognizing many will disagree with this, I might suggest the system is suffering this crop year from having to adjust away from the single-desk selling system of the former Canadian Wheat Board.

Whether you viewed the CWB as deeply flawed, or a lost benefit, it did offer some order in terms of grain deliveries, sales, and the transportation needed to connect the two.

And then while the rail companies must take the bulk of the blame, as it is apparent they long ago decided there were greater profit in handling commodities other than grain, it might be unfair to expect them to smoothly handle what is a record crop.

I am reminded that on July 1, 2010, a storm hit Saskatchewan which caused significant flooding in many areas. Yorkton was hit with what officials terms a one-in-100-year storm event. It caused millions in damages, closing many businesses and destroying several homes.

After the crisis the local government assessed the drainage system in Yorkton and found it lacking. They have since invested significant dollars in new storm water retention ponds and ditching, to better safeguard the city against deluges of rain.

But even with the improved system the system is not designed to handle a one-in-10-year storm.

And the rail system is never going to be designed to completely handle a record-setting crop. To have such capacity would mean most years there would be poorly utilized equipment in average crop years.

Certainly the rail system should be doing better than it is, but to point the finger of blame in this case is not to point at a singular target.


[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Glacier Media Inc.

License Comments

Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Yorkton This Week welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus


Quick Vote

  • Should the Sunrise Health Region be closing beds at the Skinner Unit?
  • YES
  • 19%
  • No
  • 81%
  • Total Votes: 68


Markets





LOG IN



Lost your password?