Sunday May 19, 2013




Pakistan condemns first US drone strike since parliament demanded the attacks end


Undated family handout photo issued by the British Red Cross Sunday April 29, 2012 of British humanitarian worker Khalil Dale, who has been killed in Pakistan after being kidnapped in January. His body was found in an orchard in Quetta Sunday, his throat slit and a note attached to his body saying he was killed because no ransom was paid, police said. Quetta, the capital of Baluchistan province, lies close to the Afghan border and for decades has hosted thousands of refugees from that country. The Red Cross operates clinics in the city that treat people wounded in the war in Afghanistan, including Taliban insurgents. (AP Photo/ Family via Red Cross)

ISLAMABAD - Pakistan on Monday condemned a U.S. drone strike that killed three suspected Islamist militants in the northwest, the first since the country's parliament demanded that Washington end the attacks two weeks ago.

U.S. officials have indicated in private that they have no intention of stopping the covert CIA drone program in Pakistan, which could imperil the Obama administration's attempts to get Islamabad to reopen supply lines to NATO troops in Afghanistan.

Pakistan closed its Afghan border crossings to NATO supplies last November in retaliation for American airstrikes that accidentally killed 24 Pakistani soldiers. The government also kicked the U.S. out of a base used by American drones.

After months of political wrangling, the Pakistani parliament in mid-April unanimously approved new guidelines for the country in its relationship with the U.S., a move that Washington hoped would pave the way for the supply lines to reopen.

But that has not yet happened.

One source of conflict is parliament's demand that the U.S. provide an "unconditional apology" for the deaths of the Pakistani troops. The U.S. has expressed regret, but has declined to apologize — a decision that appears to be driven by domestic political considerations. The U.S. has said its troops fired in self-defence — a claim disputed by Pakistan — and the White House could be concerned about Republican criticism if it apologizes.

Drone attacks are the other major source of conflict. President Barack Obama significantly ramped up the strikes when he took office in 2009, and while the U.S. has said little publicly about the attacks, American officials have argued in private that they are critical to targeting Taliban and al-Qaida fighters who threaten the West.

The latest attack Sunday killed three suspected militants sheltering in an abandoned school in the North Waziristan tribal area along the Afghan border, said Pakistani intelligence officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to talk to the media.

Pakistan's Foreign Ministry issued a statement early Monday saying the strikes "are in total contravention of international law and established norms of interstate relations."

"The government of Pakistan has consistently maintained that drone attacks are violative of its territorial integrity and sovereignty," it said.

It's not the first time the U.S. has ignored Pakistan's parliament, which demanded an end to drone strikes in 2008. The attacks are unpopular because many Pakistanis believe they mostly kill civilians, an allegation disputed by the U.S. and independent research.

The issue is complicated by the fact that some elements of the Pakistani government, including the military, have helped the U.S. carry out some of the strikes in the past. That co-operation has come under strain as the relationship between the two countries has deteriorated, but many analysts believe the Pakistani military still supports the program at some level.


Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Yorkton This Week welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus




Quick Vote

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.


Markets





LOG IN



Lost your password?