Agriculture This Week - Scientific steps important to ag

In North America a lot of people are wanting agriculture to take a step back to its past.

The idea of organic farming, with a reliance on more tillage, greater crop rotations, and of course no chemical applications, is much like the farming of the pre-1960s. The further back you go, the more truly organic the average farm would have been. 

article continues below

On the livestock side of things a segment of consumers want to know their food comes from farms utilizing systems akin to an earlier time in agriculture. 

The concepts of laying hens free-ranging through the yard in search of bugs to eat, and pigs rooting in the mud to cool on a hot day, is seen as the better way to raise the stock than large scale, modern barns. 

One can argue about which is truly better in terms of the welfare of the animal, but that is a debate for another day. 

What is of interest in this case is how we in North America, along with a few other areas of the world, have the luxury of questioning how our food is produced. We have that luxury because most of us have the disposable income necessary to have food on the table. And, we have grocery stores with the shelves filled with food just down the street. 

That is not the case in many places in the world. 

Many people, in many countries, live on a few hundred dollars; Malawi, Burundi, the Central African Republic and Liberia, among the poorest with Gross National Income (GNI) per Capita under $400. Imagine keeping food on the table with such a miniscule income. 

And there is also the issue of producing the food. 

It is interesting to note China, a country where the population grows, is still a country where farmers have had small flocks of chickens. But, the country is working on moving away from small flocks to large scale operations, with a plan to produce millions of laying hens to a billion eggs a day. The numbers are staggering, but the Chinese population in 2016 was somewhere around 1.4 billion so the daily food requirements are equally massive. 

The likelihood of free-run hens accomplishing a goal of one billion eggs a day would be a stretch at best. 

That is not to suggest animal welfare is not important, nor is it suggesting controls of chemical use on crops are not important, but there does need to be balance. 

Feeding the world is the first step, and technology, and farm advancements are a large part of what makes that possible.

Calvin Daniels is the editor at Yorkton This Week. 

© Copyright Yorkton This Week


NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Yorkton This Week welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus

Budget POLL

Did Tuesday's federal budget have an impact on your thinking toward a federal election?

or  view results

Popular Agriculture News