The simplicity makes card game a great choice

When it comes to game designers James Ernest is one of my favourites.

Ernest’s best game by far is the modern classic Tak, one of my favourite abstract strategy games in recent years, but he has had his hand in creating other games including the highly addictive Pairs, Button Men and Unexploded Cow.

article continues below

And now there is Girl Genius: The Works, which Ernest designed along with Phil Foglio.

So to start with the rule set notes; “Girl Genius is a web comic of adventure, romance and mad science, created by Phil and Kaja Foglio. It has been running constantly since 2001, and has won many accolades and awards.

“The story follows the adventures of Agatha Heterodyne, mad genius and heir to a mysterious and powerful bloodline.”

And now there is what might be described as a companion game to the web comic.

“Girl Genius: The Works is a strategy card game designed by James Ernest, and was first released in 2001, right alongside the comic. In The Works, everything in the world is a cog in a giant machine. Cards flip, spin and pop, and have diverse and interesting effects (not all of which are good),” describe the rules.

The strategy can be complex, but the basic game is pretty simple. There are hundreds of different cards in the set, with interesting effects and combinations at every turn.

“The game takes place on a 12-card board. On each turn, you will flip a card, spin a card, and check to see if anything popped. When cards pop, they can have special effects, which might lead to popping more cards, losing turns, or many other interesting things.

“After you pop a card it goes into your Score Pile, where it is worth points. The first player to collect enough points wins the game.”

The strategy of course comes from determining which card from your hand to put into the grid, and perhaps more importantly its orientation; does it open a path for your opponent to score? Or, will its placement force a move that ultimately favours you?

“The most important decision in this game is how to replace the cards you pop,” describes the rule set. “It’s probably obvious that the first few cards you take will be fairly random. But as soon as you start to play replacements onto the board, you are choosing how the game will unfold.

“Remember that once the board is closed, players will be forced to take a move if there is one. While it may be tempting to freeze the board, it’s actually much more effective to give your opponent a single bad move, or create one move that sets you up a better one.”

The Works is, at its heart, a two-player game. There is a good deal of strategy in setting up moves for yourself, and this can be a little more chaotic when you add more players.

The rules however are designed to work for as many as six players, “so don’t be confused if some wording implies more opponents than you. “If you play with four or six players, we recommend that you play in teams. The target score for a team is equal to the total of the target scores for the individual players. For example, with four players, the winners are the first team to score a total of 80 points.”

I will suggest when a game is generally designed for two players it is usually best to keep it two players. More might seem to be a good idea in terms of the social aspect of gaming, but the chaos leaves you with little control.

Check it out at www.cheapass.com

Thanks to fellow gamer Adam Daniels for his help in running through this game for review.

For a bonus game review head to yorktonthisweek.com where a review of the game Flint and Feather has been posted this week.

© Copyright Yorkton This Week

Comments

NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Yorkton This Week welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus

City Ops POLL

Should the City of Yorkton replace the contaminated Public Works building with a new $20 million City Operations Centre?

or  view results